Cases
2012Nu736 Revocation of Disposition of Disqualified for a substitute payment
Plaintiff-Appellant
1. A;
2. B
3. C.
4. D;
5. E.
Defendant Appellant
The head of the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Office
The first instance judgment
Gwangju District Court Decision 2012Guhap10 Decided June 21, 2012
Conclusion of Pleadings
October 25, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
November 22, 2012
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On November 8, 2011, the Defendant’s non-conformity disposition against Plaintiff A and B and the non-conformity disposition against Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively, shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and all plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
The presiding judge, senior judge and assistant judge
Judges Cho Jae-ho
Judges Namnam Sea