logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.10.19 2016고단2188
상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 19:30 on June 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim B (the age of 68) who was not adequate to appraise the Defendant’s shoulder in front of Macheon-gu, Macheon-gu; (b) placed the Defendant’s shoulder with his hand, scambling the Defendant’s shoulder, and scambling the victim’s body with his hand once with his hand; (c) opened the victim’s body once on the floor with his hand; and (d) 20 meters away from the victim’s body, the Defendant left the victim’s body by putting about 19:30 meters from the victim’s back to the victim’s her hand with his her her scambow; and (d) caused scam to the victim’s scambling and scambling with his son, thereby causing about 4 weeks of injury to the victim.

2. Defendant B threatened the victim on the date, time, place, as described in paragraph (1) above with the victim A (58 years of age). For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant: (a) took the brick (a) that is a dangerous object around the City/Do; (b) about 7cm in length; and (c) about 20cm in length; and (b) took the victim into his hand; and (c) intimidation the victim “I kin once today.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (the Defendant A is on the second date)

1. Descriptions of a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to images (No. 17 No. 17) of on-site and refluent photographs;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of imprisonment;

1. As to the Defendants under suspended execution, conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: The Defendants appear to have led to the confession of each of the instant crimes and to repent of their mistakes; the Defendants do not want punishment for each of the instant crimes: (a) the instant crimes were committed by force to one another at the minor expense; (b) the nature of each of the instant crimes was not good; and (c) the Defendants had already been punished for the same type of crimes over several occasions; (d) the Defendants were not aware of the fact that they had already been punished for the same offense.

arrow