logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.12.23 2016고단2237
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A and B violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) committed on October 16, 2016, on the ground that, around 17:40 on October 16, 2016, the victim F (the 39-year age), even though the Defendants were unable to move a vehicle parked, the Defendants continued to request the Defendants to move the vehicle without the vehicle parked. However, Defendant A was ske the victim’s head head, and Defendant B was divided into the victim’s back timber.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as salted tensions, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. 피고인 A, 피고인 B의 공무집행방해 피고인들은 제1항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서, 위 피해자의 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 평택경찰서 G파출소 소속 경장 H(26세)와 순경 I이 폭행사건의 진상을 파악하려 피고인들에게 질문을 하자, 피고인 A은 “중국인 싸움에 한국경찰이 왜 끼어드냐”고 소리치며 주먹으로 경장 H의 가슴을 수회 때리고 낭심과 정강이를 발로 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the above police officers attempted to arrest Defendant A as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant B was arrested from the above police officers as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties by keeping the shoulder of the police officer H so that he could not arrest the Defendant B, and sculing the flap of 1’s flab, and eventually arrested him as a flagrant offender

In order to interfere with the arrest of the defendant B, the name unsatisf, which was included in the above, was fluored by putting a light H in excess of the floor of the knife, walking the knife one time in a way to walk the knife, and knife the knife's chest.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed an injury to the victim Ha, which requires a two-day treatment for the victim Ha, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officers in relation to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B;

1. A witness H and I.

arrow