logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고합249
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status of the Defendants] Defendant A is the director general of F Party E Metropolitan City as the head of D E chain, and Defendant B is the head of F Party I Council as the operator of H.

[2] The representative of a political party, his agent, employee, other employed persons, and party members who are executive officers of a political party shall not make contributions to the election in favor of the candidate or political party to which he belongs before the election period in connection with the business of the political party, and no one shall make, or have anyone make contributions to, the election for the candidate or the political party to which he belongs, in connection with the election, and shall not offer, express an intention to offer, or promise to offer money, valuables, entertainment and other property benefits to the competition elector for the purpose of having the competition elector cast his vote in connection with the election

Defendant

A around March 22, 2017, at the meeting of the E Metropolitan City Party E (F Party E) held in the office of the Seoul Metropolitan City Party E (F Party E) located in J, recommended to increase the percentage of the intra-party competition to elect the candidates for the F Party in relation to the 19th presidential election to be held on May 9, 2017, and led to the awareness of the fact that there was no significant role in the ordinary party.

Defendant

A recruited 17 sirens and drivers who are used in the transportation of light-line electors through K, L, M, etc., which operate his string car company.

Defendant

A around March 23, 2017, at the H office of Defendant B’s N’s operation, Defendant B told Defendant B to the effect that “to invite a light-line elector to support vehicles,” and Defendant B respondeded to the purport that “to invite 50 persons or 60 persons from the time of the light-line to the time of the light-line,” and recruited a light-line elector to participate in the light-line election at the place of the center for senior citizens, etc. located in the center for senior citizens.

Defendant

A is the defendant in front of the Qua in P around March 25, 2017.

arrow