logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.03 2014나37360
대여금
Text

1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance, which cited the judgment, stated in this case, D paid the full amount of the borrowed money to the Plaintiff.

The Defendants’ assertion that there is a lack of evidence to acknowledge the Defendants’ assertion that the Plaintiff paid KRW 180,000,000, out of the loans 265,000,000 from D, and the Plaintiff agreed to terminate a claim and obligation between D and D is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the judgment that it is difficult to reverse even if the testimony of the witness H of the first instance court is added to the testimony of the witness of the first instance court, and thus, it is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow