1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows. The court's explanation of this case is that "each description of Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4" in 11 written 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "each description of Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)", and even if any description of Eul evidence Nos. 5 through 9 additionally submitted in the court of first instance is added, it is difficult to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance that non-A borrowed KRW 50 million from the plaintiff, except for addition of the judgment that it is difficult to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance that the defendant borrowed KRW 50 million from the plaintiff, which is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.