1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The Defendant’s grounds for appeal do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance trial. However, even if the evidence submitted in the first instance trial, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the full amount of the loan recognized in the first instance trial, as the Defendant asserted, even if he did not appear to testify in G with the witness G at the

It is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff settled the repayment of the above loan by transferring the ownership of the “Fel” in Kim Jong-si to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Thus, the first instance judgment is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.