1. The part against Defendant H in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiffs who correspond to the above revoked part are Defendant H.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal as described in the following 2.2. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to be mard;

A. Defendant B and Defendant C submitted the 16th annual report to the Financial Services Commission on March 27, 2009, and around March 30, 2009, the said audit report prepared by Defendant A accounting corporation published the 16th annual report attached thereto.”

(b) Forms 13 through 19 of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 17, 20, 28, 29, and Eul evidence No. 5, the court below decided to acquire the right of management of Eul's shares and shares from defendant Eul and Eul around February 13, 2009, and requested R, defendant E, and defendant D to take over the right of management of P's shares and shares. At that time, the court below ordered R, defendant E, and defendant D to take over the right of management of P's shares and shares from the defendant Eul and Eul. The above bill was approved; ② the defendant D obtained approval for the execution of P's shares and shares as the representative director from April 17, 2009; ③ the defendant D was also present at the meeting related to accounting; ③ the defendant D's annual report No. 2500, Mar. 25, 2009; and ④ The defendant D's annual report No. 1 was submitted to the P's board of directors.