1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[ although the indictment does not contain the part of the record of the crime, the facts of the criminal records constituting concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act are not criminal facts but criminal facts, and the facts of the criminal records can be recognized by the following evidence, so this part of the indictment may be added and recognized.]

On May 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment at the Gwangju District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment becomes final and conclusive around September 2015.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant was a person who operated a mobile phone sales store under the trade name of "C" in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju.

1. Around May 19, 2014, the Defendant made an application for the registration of KT mobile access to the mobile phone DD D with a verification-type pen attached to C, stating “E”, “F” and “E” in the customer name column of customer information, and signed and signed the application for registration in the name of E.

However, the defendant did not allow the above E to prepare the above application for accession.

In other words, the Defendant submitted an application for the entry of the E in the above name to the case company.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged an application for the KR mobile joining in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised an application for the KR mobile joining in the name of E, a forged private document.

2. On July 16, 2014, the Defendant made an application for the application for the registration of KT mobile membership of the cell phone G G with the verification-type pen attached to C, stating “E”, “F”, and “E” in the applicant column in the customer name column of customer information, and signed and signed the application for the registration of E.

However, the defendant did not allow the above E to prepare the above application for accession.

In other words, the Defendant submitted an application for the entry of the E in the above name to the case company.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, counterfeits mobile subscription application in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations, is forged.