1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates his/her tables (hereinafter “instant tables”) at the Internet website server.

B. On November 16, 2016, the Defendant prepared and posted the comments, such as the statement in the attached Form, on the comments written by the Plaintiff of the instant Blogs, and deleted the comments on the same day on the same day.

C. On the same day, the Defendant again prepared and posted comments on the same content as other comments on the Plaintiff’s preparation, and the Plaintiff again deleted the comments on the same day.

However, on the same day, the defendant again prepared and posted comments on the same contents as the instant Blog, and the plaintiff deleted the comments again on the same day.

E. In addition, the defendant provided the Internet website's book information column on the same day, and prepared and posted the above comments on the author's book "C" on the same day. On the same day, the plaintiff, who discovered it, requested the Niber Customer Center to suspend the posting of the above comments, and deleted the above comments.

F. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant as the offense of insult and the offense of violating the Personal Information Protection Act, and the Defendant was punished by a fine of KRW 700,000 by insult by the Yeongdeungpo-gu District Prosecutors’ Office (No. 55) (No. 2017 type No. 55), and was subject to a disposition of incompetence of evidence against the fact of violating the Personal Information Protection Act.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 6-1, 2-2, and Gap evidence 15-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. According to the above facts, the defendant publicly insulting the plaintiff by posting an abstract judgment that could undermine the plaintiff's social evaluation or a statement expressing the plaintiff's anti-destructive sentiment on the Internet website bulletin board where many unspecified people can confirm the contents of the writing, and thereby, the plaintiff suffered mental suffering.