beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won, and the defendant F shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendant A worked as an employee at the “H” restaurant operated by the injured party B located in the Suwon-si G from May 2016 to May 13, 2017. Defendant F is the child of Defendant A.
The Defendants are dissatisfied with Defendant A’s working at the above restaurant and retired from the restaurant due to the dispute with other employees. Defendant A posted an article that slanders the victim and the above restaurant to Defendant F. Defendant F posted a notice on May 26, 2017 on the Internet I B’s above restaurant, and Defendant F posted a notice on the Internet I’s above restaurant at the end of the week, “The H A’s president head of the H A’s cafeteria was promised to do so, and I’s head was fluenced, so I’s head was fluenced, and I’s head was fluenced, and I’s head was fluenced, and I’s head was fluenced, and I’s head was fluced.”
As a result, the Defendants conspired to defame the victims by revealing facts openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering them.
2. Defendant F’s single criminal conduct listens to the Defendant’s mother’s statement of the complaint about the victim B and the restaurant operated by the Defendant’s mother, with the mind that he/she believed it as a fact and slanders the victim, and on April 26, 2017, Defendant F posted a notice on the Internet I B’s above restaurant on the Internet I’s Internet I’s instant restaurant on the B’s B’s B’s B’, and I’t see that he/she was slicked with the Defendant’s statement of “(b). (C) I’s statement of the fact that I’s mother was slick at the Internet I’s instant restaurant. (C) I’s statement of the fact that I’s she was slicked, and I’t slicked, and I’t seem to have a sex. From that time to June 13, 2017, the Defendant posted comments on the victim, such as the list of crimes.
Accordingly, the defendant revealed facts openly through the information and communication network with a view to slandering the victim.