logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019.07.24 2019나20376
직권면직무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, can be deemed legitimate.

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is as follows. The court's reasoning is as follows: (a) under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, "after passing through it" as "after passing through it; (b) "in the fourth sentence," "in the table of the judgment of the court of first instance," "employee engaged in employment expenses" as "K"; (c) "this court" as "the first instance court"; (d) "Personnel Regulations" as "Personnel Regulations"; (e) "in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance as "in the second sentence, February 26, 2018" as "after passing through it; and (e) "Proceedings Committee" as "Personnel Committee"; and (e) "AC" as "AE" as "the first sentence of the judgment of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow