1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 5-1 to 3, Eul evidence 7 and 8.

The defendant is a sexually out-of-the-presidential zone that operates the D Sung-type department (hereinafter referred to as the "instant council member") located in five floors of the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. Around May 16, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) had a member of the instant Council consulted the Defendant with respect to an internal and external alcohol; (b) had been administered by the Defendant on May 18, 2017 by administering an internal and external alcohol and drugs on the part of the instant Council; (c) had been administered by the Defendant on May 18, 201

(hereinafter “instant procedure”). C.

According to the photographs taken around May 18, 2018, one year after the instant procedure, the head of the household finds that the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household and the head of the household

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff is obligated to remove the part 5.3 million won of the eyebrow from the defendant, and request the defendant to perform the procedure of this case to collect the part fest in the both sides of the eyebrow. As a result of the procedure of this case, due to the defendant's negligence in treatment, the plaintiff did not perform the procedure to collect the part fest in the eyebrow, and the defendant did not give specific explanation about the procedure of this case to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is obliged to undergo the procedure to recover the part 5.3 million won of the eyebrow from the plaintiff for treatment of the result of this case. The defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the above 5.3 million won of the damage suffered by the above illegal act, and the defendant is obliged to pay the plaintiff the compensation for delay to the plaintiff. 2) The defendant's argument is for the purpose of removing the name fladder in this case from the plaintiff and relaxing the part furine in the vicinity of the furine in this case from the plaintiff.