logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.14 2015가합32752
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On July 23, 2012, December 26, 2012, and December 27, 2013, to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) from Gsung branch located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on December 27, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are operating the Gsung Foreign Department located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”).

B. On July 20, 2012, the Defendant found the Plaintiff hospital and received consultation and examination for the beauty of both eyes from the Plaintiff, and decided to undergo such surgery after receiving the diagnosis from the Plaintiff B that it is necessary to conduct a sacrife crym crym cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp operation.

C. On July 23, 2012, Plaintiff B performed an operation (hereinafter “the first operation of this case”) with the foregoing content, and removed the brupted B of the operation department on July 30, 2012.

However, on August 29, 2012, the Defendant complained of both eyes lines as a result of the operation, and filed a request for re-operation on or around August 29, 2012. On December 26, 2012, the amount of four months from the Defendant’s upper eye was past, and the Defendant performed re-discrimination (hereinafter “the second surgery”).

After the first and second operations of this case, both sides of the defendant were unable to completely string, and the length of the interior angle (the end part close to the nose) of both snow differs from each other, and the outer angle (the outer end of the snow, the outer end of the snow) of both snow left strings and the strings.

(2) The above symptoms appear after the first operation of this case, and it is not clear whether the second operation of this case occurred after the second operation of this case). After the second operation of this case, the defendant can make a cryptive effort, and the symptoms show that the part inside the left eye of the snow of this case in the surface of the water is small, and that the snow is not completely cut off.

arrow