The defendant's KRW 3,00,000 and about this, 5% per annum from March 4, 2019 to October 22, 2020 to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 4, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) applied to the Defendant’s source care store located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant’s member”); (b) received from the Defendant the racule procedure using the racer (hereinafter “instant procedure”).

B. The instant procedure is accompanied by a treatment that may stimulate people through the terminal pressure, which is an equipment for maternal treatment, such as accelerator treatment, and the instant treatment. An accelerator may cause side effects, such as infectious diseases, coloring, scarvings, and red pans, by forming a scarin pole in the skin through a rash survey of a small size of the scar in order to stimulate the scarcity, and by using a treatment method that increases the scarlogity of the scarcity and increases the scarlog.

C. On March 10, 2019, the Plaintiff complained of the Red Cross symptoms of face side side after the instant procedure, and applied to Defendant Council member on March 10, 2019. The Defendant directed the Defendant to go back, and given guidance to go back on April 19, 201, and the same year.

5.13.13. The same year;

5.27.27. The same year

6. 10. Meice Roves Roves d.

The plaintiff is currently chronic divers and sculatory scirrosiss, and is in a state of being colored on the left side of this end.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2 (including a branch number) and images, the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the director of Gangwon University Hospital of this Court and the result of the physical entrustment, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's negligence or violation of the duty of explanation led to the plaintiff's present malicious result. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money to the plaintiff as part of the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above negligence.

1. The Defendant was negligent in the process of the instant procedure, provided that the Plaintiff conducted an examination of excessive robbery and that the Plaintiff caused side effects, such as visual and polar contact skin infection, etc.