logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.12.02 2013고정2723
건설기술관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the B corporation, and the defendant B corporation (hereinafter referred to as "B") is a corporation with the purpose of building business, etc.

Defendant

The representative F of A and E Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “E”) entered into a contract with G, the owner of the building, to jointly perform the construction work of the main complex building in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H (hereinafter referred to as “E”), with B and E, to jointly perform the construction work of the main complex building in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “E”), 117 square meters of underground floor, 9 stories, annual area, 15,5087.65 square meters, officetels 117 square meters, 68 households of the stud apartment, neighborhood living facilities, etc., and construction period from May 29, 2012 to May 31, 2014.

Accordingly, G, the owner of the building, through the design office, has applied for the building permit of the building in question (see May 8, 2012) and the report on the commencement of construction (see July 23, 2012). G, the owner of the building, is located in the slope of the construction site, and the apartment house is located in the slope of the apartment, the side of the apartment house is located in the apartment, and the apartment house is located on the side, and the apartment house is located in the apartment, and the apartment house is located on the side, and the construction is approved by Guro-gu Office by submitting a plan for the construction permit and the safety management thereof.

1. Defendant A along with the foregoing F, and from July 23, 2012 to the same year.

9. By June, in order to reduce the construction amount at the construction site of the above main complex construction work site, the construction work was conducted by arbitrarily changing the construction method of soil-preventive body without formulating a safety management plan through calculating the safety structure of the earth, even though the soil-preventive body was to be constructed by changing it into “H file earth wall method” unlike the above contents of permission.

Accordingly, the defendant did not establish a safety management plan for construction works as a constructor in collusion with F.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. failed to establish the safety management plan as above as a constructor with respect to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as set forth in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Trial records of the third time;

arrow