logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.05.24 2018고단4430
건설산업기본법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, by a fine of ten thousand won,00,000 won.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From July 29, 2014 to February 26, 2016, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, the representative of the company B, and the representative of the company B from February 27, 2016 to December 27, 2017, he/she listed Dong E as an internal director, and is a constructor who operates the above company together with the above E, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of construction business, etc.

1. No defendant A constructor shall allow any third person to contract or perform construction works by using his/her name or trade name, or lend his/her construction business registration certificate or construction business registration pocket book to any third person;

Nevertheless, around October 2014, the Defendant agreed to send a copy of the construction business registration certificate and related documents related to the construction business report to H, the owner of the above F and Chungcheongnam-gun G collective housing, under the condition that he/she collects approximately KRW 600,000,000,000 from the above company office via F, a hub for arranging the construction license lending loan loan, and the above E lends the construction business registration certificate to the address designated by F with a copy of the construction business registration certificate and the related documents related to the construction report, and around that time, the Defendant leased the construction business registration certificate to H by using the above company’s trade name on October 2014.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with E to lend construction business registration certificate around October 2014, and from that time, leased construction business registration certificate 119 times from that time to January 2017, as described in the annexed crime list.

2. The Defendant B’s representative or employer, A, and E leased the construction business registration certificate to another person regarding the Defendant’s business as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date)

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the defendant A concerning the suspect interrogation protocol;

1. Making some statements concerning E in the protocol of interrogation of suspects by the prosecution;

1. Part of each protocol of interrogation of police officers against I, J, K, and L.

arrow