logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.16 2016나2079633
부당이득금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to the instant case is as follows: “Down Park and C 150 square meters on the ground of large 1,803 square meters on the ground of the first instance judgment; “150 square meters on the ground of 1,803 square meters among land;” “The conditions for authorization of the third 17 square meters on the ground of 3rd 17 square meters” as “the conditions for authorization” (hereinafter “instant conditions for authorization”); and “ August 26, 201” as “ September 8, 201”; and “The first 1 of the reasons for the first 1 judgment.”

(d) Paragraph 1:

As stated in paragraph 8, " April 2, 2014" shall be amended to " April 2, 2012", "in entering into a contract", "in the 8th 14th ," and "in the 13th 2nd , the Ordinance on Sewerage Use" shall be amended to "in the contract," respectively, and "in the 14th 18th 14th 14th 14th 2 of the first instance judgment."

The following is added to Section 3-A (A) and the 16th to 5th 3th 16th 16th 2th b below. The 16th 9th 9th 9 was fully known.

“ was fully aware of the existence of it.”

"A change in the course of the first instance judgment, 16th 18th 2th 3th b below.

No. 4 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

(b) 2.e;

Section 2-C.

A change is made in accordance with paragraph, 19, 18, 19, 18, 100, and 20, 10, 3,000 following the first instance judgment.

A claim shall be added, and except for the case where “ February 27, 201” was changed to “ February 27, 2014.” No. 22 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as those for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited as it is by the main sentence of

2. The changed part

A. Article 1 of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance

D. At the time the initial head of Seocho-gu Office initially added the instant authorization condition, the Defendant’s land located outside the instant project zone, but the entire sewage car was intended to be relocated to the Defendant’s land outside the instant project zone, but the space is not adequate, and part of the sewage car should be located within the instant project zone.

arrow