logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.02.05 2015나12187
분양대금반환
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① 2nd 8,9,10 of the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to ① 2nd 10 of the revocation on the ground of non-performance of the obligation to notify, ② 2nd 2nd 2-2 of the revocation on the ground of fraudulent intent; ③ 2nd 2-3 of the revocation on the ground of mistake; ④ 2nd 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 18th 2nd 3nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 29th 2nd 2nd 3rd 29th 2nd 3rd 29th 2nd 3rd 29th 29th 2nd 3rd 19th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3nd 3nd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3

(b) 2 paragraphs 2 and 3

B. (1) The term “paragraph (j)”

(b) paragraphs 3 and 3:

(b) 2) with paragraph (j)(j) and 7’s “this case” to 10’s “this case.”

In light of the above various circumstances, etc., it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs alone was insufficient to achieve the purpose of the sales contract in the apartment of this case, and that there was a serious violation of the view right and right to enjoy sunshine or a serious violation of privacy on the apartment of this case. There is no evidence

“Ro.” Ro. 21 E.W.

B. 1) The term “kh” in Section 1.

B.2) In addition to the change to subsection (d) of this section, the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the grounds for the judgment of the first instance court.

arrow