1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “The amount of KRW 81.2 million paid from May 1996 to June 19, 197” from May 16, 196 to “71.2 million”; “the amount of KRW 2.87 billion” from June 19, 197 to “the amount of KRW 8.1.2 million” from “the amount of KRW 2.88 billion” from “the amount of KRW 2.81.2 million” from “the amount of KRW 1.2 million” from “the amount of KRW 2.8 billion” from “the amount of KRW 2

A. Paragraph 3 of Article 3-A of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows (Article 1 of the Change 1) is as follows (Article 3-1 of the Civil Procedure Act : (a) 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance is insufficient to recognize that the contract for the change of this case was concluded between the plaintiff, the plaintiff, and the deceased; and (b) 6 of the judgment of first instance through 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows (Article 3 of the Change 1); and (c) 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, in addition to each change (Article 1-1 of the Change 1).

A. 3) Accordingly, the Defendant, who is the deceased’s heir, is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for shares of 374.4/4 of the land of this case due to the change of the sales contract of this case.

Preliminaryly, if the purchaser of the instant revised sales contract is not the Plaintiff A but the Plaintiff B, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership to the Plaintiff B.

[Attachment 2] - Of the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, the third-A of the judgment.

On December 31, 1993, the deceased sold 231.4 square meters (70 square meters) out of the land in this case to Plaintiff B, and received 1.1 billion won as the purchase price from Plaintiff B on December 31, 1993, the deceased borrowed 200 million won as the moving expenses of the redevelopment project in this case from Plaintiff B on December 31, 1993, and the deceased borrowed 200 million won as the moving expenses of the redevelopment project in this case from Plaintiff B on June 4, 1997. The deceased borrowed 1.5 billion won as the moving expenses of the redevelopment project in this case to the Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Csan”) on June 4, 1997.