logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.12.22 2020고정1588
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:55 on June 10, 2020, the Defendant driven the BM3 car volume and proceeded with the front side road of Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the front side road from the D apartment room to the Awning side.

It is the place where a crosswalk without signal lights is installed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to temporarily stop and slowly drive, and to ensure that there is a pedestrian who enters the crosswalk well, and to ensure that there is a pedestrian who enters the crosswalk, and to stop the crosswalk and prevent the accident by driving it slowly.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the victim E (the age of 64) who crosses the right side from the right side of the crosswalk to the left side of the crosswalk, the left side part of the victim E (the age of 64) conflicted with the front part of the vehicle's right side, thereby suffering from the injury such as the throke, which requires the victim's treatment of

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident report, etc. and a actual survey report, etc.;

1. Investigation report (related to field surveys and CCTV surveys for crime prevention);

1. A medical certificate (the defendant asserts that the traffic accident in this case was not caused at a crosswalk. However, in full view of each of the above evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable since it can be recognized that the traffic accident in this case occurred while the crosswalk was cut off.).

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order lies in the degree of injury inflicted on the victim of the instant traffic accident, but the defendant is recognized as substitute for the instant crime and reflects it, and the defendant pays 5.5 million won to the victim.

arrow