logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.06.26 2015고정35
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Drabalian cargo vehicle.

On July 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 16:00, while driving the front road in front of the house of Goung-gun, Goung-gun, Goung-gun at the right side of the front apartment, leading about about 10 km in Si speed.

At this point, the house is a side road, and the situation of the front bank and the friendly traffic is hard to see.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of the previous, current, and well-being of traffic by temporarily suspending or slowly driving the motor vehicle before entering the intersection, and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is.

A bicycle driven by the victim FF(8 years of age, South Korea) was found and was rapidly operated.

However, the bicycle front part of the victim was driven by the front right part of the vehicle that the defendant is driving without being faced.

At the same time, the Defendant suffered from an injury, such as spawn, left-hand side, etc. of the damaged vehicle that requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, destroyed the damaged vehicle to bring about 170,000 won of repairing expenses, and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant asserts that he/she had no intention to commit an escape (the victim’s mother’s preparation of the G counterpart agreement and confirmation of whether the bicycle has been accepted).

The aforementioned evidence and the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court are as follows: ① The victim F was the age of 8 years and 6 months in July 11, 2014, when the accident occurred due to H, and ② the Defendant was the elementary school student with the age of 8 years and 6 months.

arrow