(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.12.24 2015고합247

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.12.24 2015고합247

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of obstruction of performance of official duties by telephone is acquitted.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") are in a state that they lack the ability to discern things or make decisions, and they are in need of medical treatment and custody facilities and are in danger of re-offending.

1. On September 24, 2015, the Defendant received a request from the investigator in charge of civil petition who belongs to the Sungnam District Office to “(s) of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Seongnam District Public Prosecutor’s Office”) in the civil petition service center, such as “50 billion won” and “honing”, among the civil petition investigators who run in the civil petition office of the Sungnam District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Seongnam District Public Prosecutor”) and “honing to make a visit to that day.” On the other hand, many civil petitioners who are in front of the Sungnam District Public Prosecutor’s Republic of Korea were able to protect, and they committed acts to commit any harm to the public officials working in the above civil petition office.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition handling duties of public officials in charge of the Seongbuk-gu branch office.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant damaged the object for public use by citing the chair for civil petitioners, thereby damaging the civil petition’s tent, and putting the said chair on the ground floor, thereby damaging the sum of 224,000 won (70,000 won for natural repair, 154,000 won for chair repair).

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of C, D, E, F, and G;

1. Written estimate for repair and written estimate;

1. Copies of each public official certificate;

1. The scene of damage, photographs of damaged objects, CCTV recording photographs at the scene of crime, photographs of damaged parts, and photographs of damaged parts;

1. The point of mental retardation: The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court are ①.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.10.27 2014고단1866

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.28 2013고단737

-제주지방법원 2014.01.10 2013고정976

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.01.21 2019고단1397

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.11.19 2015고단2711