A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on January 27, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jung Eup prison on January 27, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 03:10 on November 20, 2019, in the “D” operated by the Victim C, the Defendant was in dispute with the Defendant’s wife and heritage; (b) while having been in dispute with the Defendant’s wife, he was placed in the restaurant by hand, and the doctor’s bridge was marked in the table; (c) he was cut off one stop on one occasion; (d) while continuing to talk about the issue of employee E and the compensation for damaged goods by the police officer called out after being reported 112, he was in talking about the above issue of employee E and the compensation for damaged goods; and (e) he was released from the floor by leaving the floor board by the height of the chair up to the head; and (e) caused damage to KRW 400,000,000 for the repair cost of the floor.

2. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), and at the same time, at the place as indicated in paragraph (1), “I fighting at a restaurant” was sent to the F Zone G belonging to the Bana Police Station G, patrolmen and patrolmen I received arbitration on the issue of compensation for damaged articles with the said employee E, and as seen above, I am out on the floor by raising the chair up to the head, and got the above G and patrolmen first step out from the above G, the Defendant sawd the chest part of the said G as her hand, and she slicked the chest part of the said G, “I am flab in the body inside the police Do,” and assaulted the chest part of the said policeman with two hands, tightly sealed the chest part of the said her chest, and boomed the flab, booming it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. E statements;

1. On the investigation report (CCTV, etc.), on-site photographs, internal investigation reports (related to the attachment of facam to police officers) and CCTV reports;