The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around 17:00 on November 19, 2014, the Defendant: (b) on the street in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul apartment 110 apartment, the fact that the victim was living together with his husband and did not actually reside with others; (c) the Defendant did not have visited the Defendant’s house, and thus, (d) caused the Defendant’s injury to the victim’s reputation, regardless of the fact that he did not have visited the Defendant’s house, the Defendant took a dysium in the Defendant’s entrance. (b) Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant dysium dysium in South and North Korea, she sleeped the house, she sleeped the house, she sleeped the house, she sleeped the house in his eye, and she saw it into a house, and caused the death of rush by stying it.

This is a crime falling under Article 307(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim E can be acknowledged the fact that the victim E withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on June 17, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.