The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant (1)’s act constitutes obstruction of worship, since the Defendant’s act was done during the time of a notice after the substantial procedure of worship was completed.

(2) The defendant also lacks evidence about his/her crime.

③ The Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act (misunderstanding of legal principles). B. Determination of the sentence (2 million won, suspension of sentence) imposed by the Prosecutor by the lower court is too unfluent and thus unfair (unfair sentencing).

A. On December 7, 2014, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged was in the E-Ssung distribution in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) among the U.S. Island, the Defendant was in the head of the Tong Tong-gu, where the Defendant was suspended from office due to the Defendant’s announcement of the above Sung-Seng J. F. of the U.S. P. P. F. F. of the U.S. Island, “The money difficult and difficult to pay is in the head of the Tong-gu Tong-gu.”

Some million won, there are no more money than a few million won, and there is no other place.

As the phrase "I amb, I amb, "I amba ma, I amba."

“Irrece Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre? Irre?? Irre?? Irre?? Irre??? Irre??? Irre?

Whether it is against a person who has not committed a crime.

The phrase “no crime is committed” and the phrase “no crime is committed” is unjust for the believers.

Maternity, flusity, and flusium.

The Ministry of Health and Welfare is wrong.

“In doing so, the F did not complete the unexploited death and did not interfere with the unexploited death.”

B. Of the grounds for appeal by the Defendant, the crime of interference with worship 1 is a legal interest in the protection of the peace and religion appraisal of the general public. As such, the crime of interference with worship is also included in the legal interest in the protection of the peace and religion appraisal of the believers attending the worship (see Supreme Court Decision 2003Do5798, May 14, 2004, etc.). The crime of interference with worship is the legal interest in the protection of the peace and religion of the public.