logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.06.12 2015고단775
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:20 on February 26, 2015, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at the home of his woman-friendly Gu D in Pariju City, deemed that the above D and the victim E (the age of 56, female) were involved in a mutual conflict, and brought the victim’s desire to “humthing hume” in concert with D, and brought the victim’s desire to “humthing hume” in concert with D, and made the victim’s desire to “humthing humeh” at one time the victim’s left part of the victim’s drink with drinking, and collected a excessive amount of 20cm in length, which is an object dangerous to the victim’s face at one time, and again, inflicted injury on the victim, such as the right-hand humbing indemnity, which requires three weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried over dangerous goods, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to excessive photographs, photographs of damaged parts, and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the defendant is led to the crime of this case in a contingent manner, which led to the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol, and that there is no penalty force exceeding the fine against the defendant. However, even though the injury of this case cannot be deemed to be negligible, it is inevitable to find out all the circumstances in which the defendant made efforts for recovery from damage, and thus, it is inevitable to punish the defendant accordingly.

However, the term of punishment was set in consideration of the above conditions favorable to the defendant, the age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, relationship with the victim, and all other conditions of sentencing.

arrow