logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.11 2015나2338
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

. at the trial.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, a E-related company, worked as production PD in the F Manufacturing Business Team, and the Defendant served as PD in the line of the same business team.

B. At around 15:30 on December 30, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff’s face and body by drinking and launching the Plaintiff according to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Defendant went out of the corridor of the D 1st floor located in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Busan, by failing to properly perform the work the Plaintiff caused, and went out.

(hereinafter “instant assault”).

C. As a result of the instant assault, the Plaintiff is a spawn and spawn in the mouths of the Apawn and the right-hand spawn of the Apawn (hereinafter referred to as “Mesohnan”) of the Apawn and spawn of the Apawn (hereinafter referred to as “Mehnan”)

) It is called as the left-hand side of the Meakak (hereinafter referred to as “Meak 32 Meak”).

) It is called as the middle right-hand (hereinafter referred to as “Ma41”)

(2) On December 30, 2013, at the Gycheon University Hospital, 196, she received leutical marcing clothes and leutical marcing surgery for each of the foregoing dental infants. From February 23, 2013 to March 5, 2015 at the Seoul National University Dental Hospital, she received care treatment for commuting and malutic leutic marcing therapy for each of the foregoing dental infants.

On February 4, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order ordering a fine of KRW 2,00,000 as Seoul Northern District Court Decision 201Da1081 on February 4, 2013 with respect to the instant assault, and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 20, 27, 31, and 32 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts acknowledged in Paragraph 1 of the basis of liability, since the Defendant assaulted the Plaintiff and inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, the Defendant should compensate for the Plaintiff’s damages caused by the instant accident as tort liability.

B. The Defendant limited liability: (a) committed an assault against the Defendant; and (b) committed an assault by the Plaintiff, such as taking the Defendant’s desire to do so.

arrow