1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Determination Gap evidence No. 1 (the defendant alleged that he prepared Gap evidence No. 1 and delivered it to the plaintiff on September 30, 2016, and on October 4, 2016, the defendant's agent present at the first day of pleading No. 1 stated that the defendant's signature as stated in Gap evidence No. 2 and the defendant's signature as stated in Gap evidence No. 1, which the defendant recognized the authenticity, are deemed to have been affixed to the same person, considering the overall purport of the arguments, the authenticity of the above document is presumed to have been formed, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the forgery). According to the above evidence No. 1, the defendant can be acknowledged to have agreed between the plaintiff and the plaintiff on April 29, 201 to pay 10,000,000 won to the plaintiff by June 30, 2014 as well as to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10,000,000 won to the plaintiff per annum No. 261,56.

2. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.