The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) lies in the following facts: (a) the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to do so; and (b) the Defendant was scood by scood with the victim’s shoulder and was scood by scood with the scood in a sofa, and there is no fact that the Defendant

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, the following circumstances acknowledged based on these evidence: (i) the victim consistently became aware from the investigative agency to the court of the fact that the Defendant had come to the victim’s movement system; (ii) the victim took a face by pursuing the fact; and (iii) the head was scood by coodh; and (iv) the knife knife was deducted and the knife died in front of the knife.

The statement is made to the effect that “the victim made the same speech,” and such statement is credibility when comprehensively taking into account the circumstances and the following circumstances as stated in the judgment of the court below. ② The defendant also made the victim’s statement and partly consistent with the victim’s statement, “The victim has been frightened, she has been frightened, she has been frightened, she has been frightened, and she has been frightened, and the victim had been frightend, and she has been frightend. ③ The date when the crime of this case occurred was reported to the reported center around March 4, 2018, and the victim called for the police station at around 19:34 on the same day, and the victim was separated from the date when it is necessary to separate the defendant and the victim, and the victim was prepared and submitted to the police station immediately after the victim’s statement on March 5, 2018, and the victim was made to the victim from March 16, 2018.