Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the regular professor of C University and C University Acquired School, and the victim D(38) is the assistant professor of the same university.

On July 11, 2016, at the Defendant’s laboratory located in Daegu E around 11:0, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s left part of the arm’s length of the Defendant’s length in his occupational dialogue to talk about the Defendant’s vision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Recordings, photographs, diagnostic notes, records of the case, medical records, and photographs [the defendant and his defense counsel]. The defendant and his defense counsel did not contain the fact that "the defendant has pushed down the victim's left chest with his/her hands, but did not contain the fact that he/she was on the left part of his/her arms."

It asserts that “........”

However, according to the medical certificate of injury (33 pages of the investigation record), the victim, on July 11, 2016, on the date of the occurrence of the instant case, was from the G Council member to “on the face of the check.”

(2) On July 13, 2016, the victim made a statement that “the left chest is strong enough to be pushed back by the body of the body.”

However, considering the fact that “the left chest” and “the left part of the shoulder or the left part of the shoulder” are almost adjoining parts, which may be somewhat different in terms of expression, ③ there is a hole in front of the victim’s left shoulder or the left part of the part (the 20 side of the investigation record) on the victim’s upper part, ④ according to the recording of recording (the 8 side of the investigation record), the injured person immediately after the occurrence of the instant case raised an assault against the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant has assaulted the victim can be sufficiently recognized.

Therefore, the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;