A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of five hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:20 on February 4, 2014, 202: (b) obtained a card in the C cafeteria located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, by using 52 copies of the card; (b) issued two copies of the card on the floor; and (c) drawn up a 7 card finally received by each party according to the order determined by comparing the number and pattern of figures; and (d) drawn up a seven card, each of which was finally received according to the order determined by comparing the number and pattern; and (e) carried out gambling by a person who has the highest priority number or pattern card in accordance with the arrangement of the number and pattern of non-sat.

2. The Defendant committed an obstruction of performance of official duties on the grounds that police officers would control the gambling site under the above Paragraph (1) at the time, place, and place under the above Paragraph (1), and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to criminal investigation by carrying out a bath, such as “We shall go to the box of why he is fright within the flab, but he shall go to the box of why he is flab, and flab with his mind.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 246 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture [the scope of recommendation] set forth in Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act: June 1 and June 4: Provided, That the criteria for handling multiple crimes with crimes for which the sentencing guidelines have not been set do not apply, are set at the lower limit.

[Decision of Sentence] When the defendant was imprisoned while gambling, he exercised force to the police officer to interfere with the legitimate execution of official duties, and thereby another person suspected of gambling.