beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant C were deadly in early 2014, and Defendant B was the friendship of Defendant A, and Defendant B was drinking together with a new wall around July 2, 2014, and Defendant A, around 07:50 on July 2, 2014, exercised violence, such as where the dispute occurred with “E” located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu, and was pushed back with the said women. Upon receipt of the report, Defendant A was subject to questioning of the circumstances of the instant case under consideration of police officers G and H belonging to the F District of the Seoul Northern Police Station of Gwangju Northern-gu, which was called up immediately after receipt of the report.
Accordingly, the Defendants, on the ground that police officers called out to their dispute and are bad, are called “unfasible,” and they continue to dispute with each other. At around 08:00 on the same day with the above police officers, they moved to the parking lot behind the above restaurant.
At this time, Defendant A, who did not sit back for the interest of Defendant A, her desire to do so, and her desire to do so from the police officers, was boomed, and the Defendant A and Defendant B were arrested as an act of obstruction of the performance of official duties on the part of Defendant A and Defendant B. Defendant A and Defendant B were arrested as an act of obstruction of the performance of official duties on the part of the police officers. (a) Defendant B and the police officers, who controlled A, expressed that “When they grow to the civilian, she will grow up to the civilian, and she will do so.” (b) Defendant A and Defendant B were arrested Defendant A and Defendant B as an act of obstruction of the official duties.
Then, Defendant C tried to arrest a flagrant offender on the ground that she was fluor A and B, one’s friendship, and assaulted the police officer’s chests of the police officer H on the ground that she attempted to arrest a flagrant offender.
As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the maintenance of public order and criminal investigation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. G, .