beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Busan High Court-2018-Nu2210 ( November 30, 2018)
Title
(C) If the address or place of business is not clear, it means a case in which the address or place of business cannot be known despite due care of a good manager.
Summary
(b) It is difficult for the tax authority to regard that the taxpayer’s duty of care was due to due care for a good manager when visiting only one time at his/her spouse’s domicile even though the taxable document was served to the taxpayer’s spouse’s domicile.
Related statutes
Article 8 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2018Du67299
Plaintiff-Appellee
Ma-○
Defendant-Appellant
○○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
Busan High Court Decision 2018Nu22210 Decided November 30, 2018
Imposition of Judgment
2019.04.11
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the argument on the grounds of appeal is deemed not to include or not to be acceptable the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition