A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2019, the defendant and the victim B (n, 37 years of age) constituted a divorce mediation.

1. In the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu Daejeon apartment on August 26, 2018, around 02:40, the Defendant suffered injury or damage to property: (a) in the Defendant’s residence in Seo-gu Daejeon apartment, Seo-gu, Daejeon: (b) on the ground that the victim met the Defendant’s horse without hearing the Defendant’s horse and went back later; (c) the victim’s face means that the victim was frighten; and (d) the victim’s cell phone was located on the floor.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim about one week of treatment, and damaged the victim's cell phone to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 681,500 is 681.50.

2. On September 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a door of the victim’s management Daren car using the key that he was aware of the situation against the victim’s will in order to check the victim’s happiness at the apartment parking lot for apartment as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article; and (b) searched the vehicle managed by the victim by following the black string images installed inside the car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Bluk records, records, and written estimates for hand-on;

1. Medical E's statement of opinion [the purport that the victim's hole and accessory shall be naturally cured without any special treatment, but it is effective to alleviate pains in treating part of the drug (i.e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g.,

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. The Defendant’s prosecutorial protocol of suspect interrogation against the Defendant is a car owned by the Defendant, which was searched by himself, and the Defendant asserts to the effect that he denied the fact that the Defendant searched a car with the car owned by the victim as a co-ownership relation with the victim, and even if it was found that the Defendant searched a car managed by himself, it is social norms.