The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the court of first instance 2.3 is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and such reasoning is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The portion of the application shall be referred to as “facilities integration management services” in Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance.

In the third case of the first instance judgment, the "liability ratio" in the 16th sentence shall be considered as "liability ratio (80%)".

According to the third judgment of the court of first instance, the actual contents of the 4th through 4th are as follows.

3. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 4 and 8, it can be acknowledged that the scope of the contract work to be performed by the Defendant includes the maintenance and management of water supply and drainage facilities. However, the mere fact alone is insufficient to view that the Defendant is responsible for the management of special risks that caused the instant accident as well as the special risks that caused the instant accident, such as the narrow and high pressure of water supply and drainage pipes, in addition to the responsibility for the management of water supply and drainage facilities itself.

Rather, according to the statement Eul evidence No. 1 and the fact-finding results of this court with respect to the insured, the insured has concluded a contract term with G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "G") to maintain and manage the drainage pipe equipment by periodically inserting chemicals to maintain and manage the drainage pipe equipment from December 23, 2016 to September 30, 2017. The insured may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff is aware that the services provided by the Plaintiff are distinguished from G. In full view of the above facts, even though the insured was coping with special risks caused by the maintenance room, the Defendant is responsible for the removal, etc. of the drainage pipe within the drainage pipe.