1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the plaintiff to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph

In the same part, the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "B" in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be "Defendant B".

The third side of the judgment of the first instance is "(Article 4 (5) of the Contract)" as "(Article 4 (5) of the Contract)."

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "(paragraph 4 of the contract)" as "(Article 4 of the contract)".

In the third part of the judgment of the first instance, the "paragraph (5) of the business acquisition agreement" shall be deemed to be "Article 4 (5) of the business acquisition agreement".

Part III of the judgment of the first instance is "B" from Part VII to "Defendant B".

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term "from the foreign country C" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "from the defendant C"

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance, the term “B and C” in the name of “Defendant B and C” shall be read as “Defendant B and C.”

Part 3 of the first instance judgment "B (25,000), C (25,000), G" in Part 19 is "Defendant B (25,000), C (25,000), and G."

The last 3rd page of the judgment of the first instance shall be "the paper number (including the paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply)".

2. Determination of the Defendants’ assertion is based on the judgment of the court of first instance.

A. The Defendants asserts that there is no benefit in confirmation seeking confirmation of shareholders' rights of the Defendant company, since the Defendants could not carry out the project to build a canal and 21 lots of land F and 21 lots of land at the time of business transfer agreement on March 15, 2016.

However, the plaintiff, the defendant B, and the defendant C respectively dispute their respective shareholders' rights, and the defendants also cannot proceed with the construction of a canal rain plant, including matters concerning the ownership of the shareholders' rights of the restored defendant company.