1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A corresponding to the amount of additional payment order shall be revoked.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows each description of evidence Nos. 21, 22 (including each number), which was additionally submitted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection or addition of a part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

A. Under the second sentence of the first instance judgment, the 5 line “070:00” shall be deemed “07:00,” and the 3 line “H” shall be deemed “D” respectively.

B. On the fourth page 11 of the first instance judgment, “9” is added in front of “10”.

C. On the 5th of the first instance judgment, the 16th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 195

The period of hospitalization recognized from April 11, 2013 to October 26, 2013 (the actual process is 162 days from April 11, 2013 to September 19, 2013, 17 days from October 29, 2013 to November 14, 2013, and 20 days in total from November 25, 2013 to December 14, 2013, but is deemed to have been hospitalized for the convenience of calculation: 10% from October 27, 2013 to July 6, 2016: 24%;

D. The sum of the total income per unit No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance calculated as follows.

E. Once the judgment of the court of first instance is first instance, the term “3,532,090 won” of “5,532,090 won” of “6,532,090 won” of 10 lines below.

F. Once the judgment of the court of first instance is not more than 3 lines below, the following shall be added.

3) Transfer treatment: 2 million won (Plaintiff A is seeking payment of KRW 110,00,000 paid on September 21, 2013, and KRW 130,000 paid on October 16, 2013, and KRW 1.30,000,000 paid on October 16, 2013. However, each of the descriptions in the evidence No. 9, No. 10, and No. 12-2 is insufficient to view that there exists a causal relationship between the transfer treatment on each of the above dates and the instant accident.

A person shall be appointed.

G. Once the judgment of the court of first instance is rendered, two lines are as follows.