A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) are those who are engaged in driving of the vehicle B in the sti-type area;

On January 1, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle without obtaining a driver's license on January 1, 2013, and changed the course to the right-hand side while driving the two-lane road in front of the ASEAN station in the two-lane of Gwangju Seo-gu.

When it is anticipated that a driver of any motor vehicle will impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change course, he/she shall not change course, and he/she has a duty of care to give prior notice of change of course and to change his/her route safely by keeping his/her traffic situation well in front of the direction, etc. in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to change the course of the victim C(50 years old) driving on the right-hand side due to the negligence of changing the course of the victim C(50 years old). The back and fences of the victim C(50) driving on the left-hand side of the vehicle were shocked with the front side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as light dump salt and tension, which requires treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the damaged taxi to fall under KRW 603,038, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim by immediately stopping the taxi.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the B SP car owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the above 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1..