beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant B is a pastor, who is the representative of Defendant D Religious Organization E branch (hereinafter “Defendant church”) and Defendant C is the wife of Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant husband and wife”), and the Plaintiff is the new person of Defendant church.
B. On January 2005, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s husband F (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s husband and wife”) met the Defendant’s husband and wife who were demoted at the healing center located in the Chungcheong area operated by the Defendant church. After that, the Plaintiff’s husband and wife visited the Defendant church 2 to 3 times a week, including counseling with the Defendant husband and wife for the resolution of family problems, etc., and the Plaintiff came to the new status of the Defendant church around February 2006 and around July 2006.
C. When the building located in Jung-gu Incheon, Incheon, which was used by the defendant church was destroyed by fire on March 20, 2006, the defendant church newly built the church building with the contribution of the plaintiff's husband and wife, but since the above area was planned to be expropriated in accordance with the urban development plan, the defendant church used the second floor located in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu as of October 14, 2007 as to the housing of the second floor located in Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, and the lease period as of October 14, 2009 and used it as the place of the defendant church.
While the defendant couple was aware of the place to move the defendant church around April 2009, the defendant couple tried to purchase the commercial building I 109 Dong, Jung-gu, Incheon (hereinafter "the commercial building of this case"). Ultimately, the defendant church did not purchase the right to lease on a deposit basis of the second floor located in H of the above Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (the cancellation of the registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis on November 23, 201).
On April 20, 2009, when the defendant couple discovered the purchase of the commercial building of this case, the plaintiff, on April 20, 2009, sold to K the amount of KRW 130 million,00,000,000 from J Apartment 1014 Dong 1203, 1200,000, which was owned by the plaintiff, to K, and on May 20, 2009.