1. The joint council of March 3, 2013, which the defendant appoints D as a delegating pastor and decides to open the church and set up the church.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The plaintiff is a member of the defendant church, who was in the position of the authority of the plaintiff, and the defendant church is a non-corporate group consisting of the members who faith the doctrine of the Germany, which belongs to the general assembly of B religious organizations and their affiliated Em Union. 2) The defendant church was established on May 28, 1979, and the defendant church was employed as a member of the above church for about 30 years.

3) On March 9, 2008, the defendant church moved F pastors into the log pastors, and D has performed its duties as the delegated pastors of the defendant church since around that time through a resolution of the joint council which selects D as the delegated pastors of the defendant church and wants to listen to it. (b) On April 6, 2012, some of the members of the defendant church filed an application against D for a provisional disposition against D seeking the suspension of the execution of duties as the delegated pastors of the defendant church (Ui District Court Support 2012Kahap21) against D on March 2, 2012. The above court did not have a resolution of the joint council which elected D as the delegated pastors of the defendant church, but did not have approved the union's resolution on the defects of the joint council, accepting some of the above members' above application on April 6, 2012 and decided to suspend the execution of their duties.

2) On the other hand, the Association of Religious Organizations E is a higher religious order of the defendant church, and after the decision to suspend the above duties, G pastor was dispatched to the temporary delegating pastor of the defendant church. 3) After the decision to suspend the above duties, some members of the defendant church filed an application against D for the provisional disposition to appoint an acting director (U.S. District Court 2012Kahap53) against D, and the above court made a decision on June 21, 2012 to appoint a pastor G as an acting director of the defendant church during the period of suspending the duties of D.

C. Some of the members of the defendant church which confirmed the judgment on the merits of the case shall not have a resolution of the joint council of March 9, 2008, which decided that the defendant church appointed D as a delegated pastor to the defendant church.