1. Defendant B and Defendant C shall each of the Plaintiff KRW 25,00,000,00, and Defendant B shall be from March 28, 2013 to Defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was a member of the Korean Film Association (hereinafter “instant church”) located in Pakistan-si. The Plaintiff was a member of the Korean Film Association (hereinafter “instant church”).

B. The Plaintiff front of his retirement age around 2010, and as the instant church has no teaching staff, the Plaintiff decided to sell the instant church.

However, in order for the instant church to be sold after being registered in the name of the Korea Telecommunication Association (the foundation that manages the property of the Korea Telecommunication Association; hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Telecommunication Association”) to which the instant church belongs, it shall undergo procedures for obtaining approval from the Korea Telecommunication Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Telecommunication Association”) General Assembly (hereinafter referred to as the “General Assembly”) after obtaining approval from the Korea Telecommunication Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Telecommunication Association”).

C. The Plaintiff decided to sell the instant church to Defendant B, which was introduced from Defendant D, and received KRW 10 million as down payment.

However, the defendant B decided not to purchase the church of this case as the meta of denial in the course of his illness.

Defendant B decided to seek another purchaser instead of purchasing the instant church, and delegated the Plaintiff with the authority to sell the instant church, and issued a receipt for the said KRW 10 million, stating that “the instant church is delegated to Defendant B with all of the instant church.”

The instant church, around July 2010, was promoted by the introduction of Defendant C to sell documents, such as the certificate of the church’s official seal ( August 27, 2010), the certificate of affiliation, the employed minutes (the date of August 22, 2010, the title of the instant church refers to the case of construction), etc., in order for Defendant B to obtain approval from the labor union and the general meeting. However, the instant church was not sold to G.

E. On September 6, 2010, the Plaintiff is an agent of H as his/her agent, and the instant case is between I and I.