A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 27, 2018, the Defendant was charged with non-detained for a crime of fraud, etc. with the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court. On January 17, 2019, the Defendant appealed on March 7, 2019 upon having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not being detained for a crime of fraud and appealed on March 7, 2019. However, the Defendant was dismissed on May 22, 2019 and became final and conclusive on May 30, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On July 16, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim B refers to the victim B, “I would have him/her enter the C company, and will deposit the education expenses to B,” at a cafeteria located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon. On May 20, 2015, the criminal defendant made a false statement to the same effect that I would leave the phone to the victim at a non-permanent place. On May 20, 2015, the criminal defendant made a false statement to the same effect as the victim at a non-permanent place located in the Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to get the victim to work in the C company.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 40,00 from the victim on July 16, 2014 as a loan from the victim, and received KRW 160,000,000 from May 20, 2015, and acquired KRW 1120,000 in total, around October 8, 2015.

2. Around July 16, 2014, the Defendant, against the victim D, made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would allow the victim D to enter the C company, and deposit the education expenses to B,” at a cafeteria located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, for the same purpose, and even after May 20, 2015 and November 18 of the same year after November 20, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the same effect that the victim would face a phone at an unclaimed place.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to get the victim to work in the C company.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.