logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.05 2012고정4653
위계공무집행방해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around March 2005, the Defendant, as a shipbuilding Chinese, entered the Republic of Korea as a visa for residence (F-2) and entered the Republic of Korea as a visa for illegal stay, submitted documents that have completed education for a certain period at a designated technical education support center for overseas Koreans (hereinafter referred to as the “support group”), and submitted a letter of recommendation from the above support group to the Immigration Office, submitted it to the Immigration Office to obtain permission for change of sojourn status as visiting employment (H-2) visa, and was gathered with the head of the Do Private Teaching Institute E in Nam-gu, Incheon.

From October 1, 201 to March 25, 2012, the Defendant registered on an educational course that takes place at the end of six months (to the end of 14:00-18:05, day 09:10-13:15) and obtained permission for change of status of stay as a cost of general training (D-4). Even if the Defendant did not undergo education on October 30, 201, he/she signed “F” in the form of the student signature of the ex officio admission record management ledger prepared as if he/she had attended the relevant private teaching institute as if he/she had received education; around November 5, 201; around January 27, 2011; around January 21, 201; around February 5, 2012; around February 1, 2012; around December 1, 2012; and submitted ex officio documents verifying that he/she had been present; around March 21, 2017>

Since then, around March 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) through a G administrative agent delegated by the Incheon Immigration Office at the port-dong 7, Jung-gu, Incheon; (b) prepared a letter of recommendation and an application; and (c) obtained permission to change the status of sojourn for visa visa (H-2) under the name of the head of the Incheon Immigration Office on April 5, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the duty of changing the status of a public official in charge of the Incheon Immigration Office by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Copy of the attendance;

arrow