The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. On July 23, 2015, the summary of the grounds for appeal found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, even though the Defendant did not violate the vehicle signal at the above intersection while driving at the distance intersection at the lower end of Busan, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the evidence duly adopted and examined as follows: ① Police Officers D, who controlled Defendant’s signal violation, to the court of the court of the court below, stated, “When the Defendant left the right to the right at the lower intersection of the lower court, he sent red stop signal at the lower intersection of the Defendant at the lower intersection, and vehicles obstructed the progress of the vehicle due to Defendant’s signal violation at the time, turn the border.” ② The point where D controlled Defendant’s signal violation is a place where the Defendant can check the lane of the passage of the direction of the lower bridge from the lower direction of the lower court to the lower court; ③ Police Officers, at the control site along D, at the lower court, at the enforcement station, did not accept the Defendant’s new signal in light of the fact that the Defendant stated in the charges of this case as the Defendant’s new stop statement in the direction of the lower court.”

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.