Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a rocketing cargo vehicle B.

On May 25, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 11:40 on May 25, 2015, and violated traffic signal by stopping the intersection of the distance front of the high-tech transformation station located in the 75 high-tech path in Gwangju Mine-gu, and making it left left at the high-speed area of the high-tech veterans hospital located in the front of the high-tech substation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. The signal system map;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site investigations and confirmation of traffic signal apparatus);

1. Article 156 Subparag. 1 and Article 5 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 13458, Aug. 11, 2015), the selection of a fine concerning criminal facts, and the selection of a fine.

1. Determination as to the Defendant’s assertion under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which is confined in a workhouse

1. The main point of the argument was that the three distances from veterans hospitals before reaching the three distances from the above high-tech transformations. According to the three distances from veterans hospitals, the three distances from the apartment buildings from the high-tech transformations, and the three distances from the high-tech transformations, even if the three distances from the high-tech transformations pass through the straight distance from the above three distances from the high-tech transformations, traffic signals will turn to the left.

Therefore, the defendant did not violate the signal and could turn to the left at the normal signals, and the defendant did not violate the signal at the time.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the court may acknowledge the fact that the defendant left the left or right to the left in violation of the red signals signals.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

A. Police Officers C, who controlled Defendant’s violation of the signal, testified that “When Defendant left the right-hand turn in the direction of the high-tech veterans hospital in the direction of the high-tech veterans hospital, the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on was sent from the direction of the high-tech veterans hospital.”

The above-mentioned high-tech substations.