A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 00:30 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant: (b) threatened the victim D (years 26) with her own, on the ground that the victim D (years 26) was her own while drinking and drinking at the “Cju” store located in B, and threatening the victim to gather her disease, which is a dangerous object on the tables.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. When the police officer F, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the date and time as stated in paragraph (1), and at the place of the performance of official duties, expressed that “scam and internal police officers were 2 years in preparation for police officers, scam and internal police officers, scambling scams. scams. scams. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. f s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. f.s. s. s. s.s. s. s. s. s. s.s. s. s.s. s. s.s. s. s.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, G, and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV images and caps;

1. Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that it is difficult to apply the sentencing criteria as it is for the case where the reasons for sentencing are mutually concurrent crimes.

The defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is easy, the victim of special intimidation has been agreed with, and the defendant was dispatched to the site.