A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 917"

1. At around 04:57 on June 7, 2016, the Defendant engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) a scambling F, which was called up after receiving a report from 112 that male and female f will scam on the roads adjacent to the Dacususususususus, located adjacent to the Mapo Police Station E zone, which was called up by the Defendant, brought up the Defendant’s female friendly G with his hand, thereby committing assaulting the Defendant’s chest part of the said F at one time with his hand to separate the Defendant and to grasp the danger and injury and the circumstances of the case.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 mobilization tasks.

"2016 Highest 1282"

2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer the means of access by financial institutions;

Nevertheless, on May 2016, the Defendant transferred the means of access to a person who is unable to know his/her name in front of an I cafeteria located in He/she was a post office account under the name of the Defendant (Account Number J), a community credit cooperative account (Account Number K), and a passbook, check card, and the relevant password, respectively, via a selective engineer.

Summary of Evidence

[Criminal facts 【2016 Highest 917】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation reports related to witnesses, etc.;

1. Response (2016 highest 1282 criminal facts);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Application of the transfer certificate or the warrant issuing statute;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts, Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and Article 6(3)1 of the same Act for each electronic financial transaction;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The offense of violating the scope of recommending the sentencing criteria under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall not be set out; and