A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 1, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant: (a) took a disturbance, such as having dynasium dynasium dynasium dynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynasium hynas

The Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason, and arrested the Defendant, and then tried to take the Defendant on the patrol check, and assaulted the Defendant, such as spite, “I am frane. N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. The photograph of the suspect’s on-site condition and the image of the E box;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to prepare and report a record of recording (Evidence No. 68 of the record);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentencing)

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination of types of crimes: Type 1 of obstruction of performance of official duties;

2. Determination of the scope of sentence: Basic area, six months to one year and four months (no special person shall be punished);

3. Sentence;