logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.10 2016고정1193
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or coerce sexual traffic for business purposes, or provide a place for sexual traffic.

The defendant was a person who operates a sexual traffic business in the name of "C" on the second floor of the building B in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, Seoul. In February 2016, the defendant installed a group of groups in "C" and two groups among six groups of groups in "C", and received KRW 100,000 as the price for sexual traffic from a male guest who found such group of groups and became the counter-party to sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, on March 3, 2016, the defendant ordered D, an employee of D, to receive 100,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from the control police officer and provide three guidance to sexual intercourse with himself/herself.

As a result, the defendant provided a place of sexual traffic for business purposes, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of a real estate lease agreement and statutes governing field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It appears that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a first offender for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, that the Defendant’s mistake is against the beginning, and that the Defendant did not have an intention to provide a place for sexual traffic from the beginning. The Defendant was engaged in sexual traffic while operating a marina room and became engaged in sexual traffic and offered its place of business as it is, and the commission

arrow